Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adam, Meldrum & Anderson Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 24, 1933No. Docket Nos. 59077, 59078, 59079Published

1. Contributions made by petitioners to certain charitable organizations are not deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses. 2. The evidence does not establish that petitioners were affiliated with P. Centemeri & Co. under section 142(c) of the Revenue Act of 1928.

1Dissent

Smith,

dissenting: The applicable taxing statute permits a corporation to deduct from gross income “ all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business.” The petitioner, operating a department store in Buffalo, New York, made certain payments in 1928 to certain charitable institutions which it charged on its books of account as advertising expenses and deducted from gross income in its tax return as ordinary and necessary expenses. The evidence shows that the payees were customers of the petitioner and that the pay*426ments were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kornhauser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Backer v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1924
  3. F. Meyer & Bro. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  4. Evening Star Newspaper Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  5. First Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API