Legal Opinion

Jones v. State ex rel. Pope County

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 15, 1853PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Writ of Error to Pope Circuit Court. The Hon. W. H. Feild, Circuit Judge, presiding^ The judgment must be reversed, because it does not appear that the plaintiffs in error were served with process. 1 Ark. 50. 2 Ark. 26. 1 Eng. 453. 4 Eng. 21. The truth of the breaches should have been found; and for this ’ error, the judgment must be reversed. 2 Ark. 382. 3 Eng. 477. ib. 353. 4 ib. 362. 5 ib. 258.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Watkins

This is an action upon a collector’s bond, brought against the sheriff and ex-officio assessor and collector of taxes of Pope county, and his securities. After setting out the bond and condition the breach assigned is, “that the said John W. Jones did not well and truly collect and pay over the said sum of thirteen hundred and seventeen dollars and seventy-seven cents so ordered to be levied for the purposes of revenue of the said county of Pope,” whereby the said writing became and is forfeited, &c.

The endorsement on the writ would show a regular service on the defendants, but it does not…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Planters' Mutual Insurance v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Briggs v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Ireland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API