Sperry v. Saul
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCharles J. Beckinella, J.
In this action by the plaintiff as committee of one Bose Bedick, an incompetent person, seeking a declaratory judgment declaring that his ward is the absolute owner of two parcels of real property, together with an accounting of the rents and profits, plaintiff moves, pursuant to rule 109 of the Buies of Civil Practice, to strike out as insufficient in law on the face thereof three separate defenses and the three counterclaims on the ground that they fail to set forth facts sufficient to constitute causes of action. In a second motion plaintiff moves for an order vacating the defendants’…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Finch v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Hathaway v. . County of DelawareNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Hearn 45 St. Corp. v. JanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In Re the Will of HillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ford v. . ClendeninNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Dinerman v. SuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1965