Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fugate v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2001No. 1998-SC-0912-MRPublished

1DissentKeller, Justice

With a profound sense of deja vu,1 I write separately to express my opinion that the trial court erred when it conducted a pretrial competency hearing in Appellant’s absence without ascertaining whether Appellant himself knowingly, vol*23untarily, and intelligently waived his right to appear.

First, I wish to emphasize that it is beyond dispute that a pretrial competency hearing is a “critical stage of the trial”2 at which a defendant has the right to be present. In my opinion, the process of defining the source and scope of a defendant’s right to be present at pretrial competency hearings…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Robert Hilton Swanson and Jack Lavoied PhippsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Juan M. Gordon, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. George Earl Larson v. Robert Tansy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Harold S. Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API