Fugate v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentKeller, Justice
With a profound sense of deja vu,1 I write separately to express my opinion that the trial court erred when it conducted a pretrial competency hearing in Appellant’s absence without ascertaining whether Appellant himself knowingly, vol*23untarily, and intelligently waived his right to appear.
First, I wish to emphasize that it is beyond dispute that a pretrial competency hearing is a “critical stage of the trial”2 at which a defendant has the right to be present. In my opinion, the process of defining the source and scope of a defendant’s right to be present at pretrial competency hearings…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Robert Hilton Swanson and Jack Lavoied PhippsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Juan M. Gordon, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- George Earl Larson v. Robert Tansy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Harold S. Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.