Legal Opinion

Peters v. Smuggler-Durant Mining Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1996No. 93CA0040, 93CA0496PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROTHENBERG.

In the first part of this consolidated action, Golden Rule Resources, Inc., (Golden Rule) appeals from the decree of the trial court quieting title to certain real property in Frank Peters. Peters cross-appeals from that judgment.

In the second part of this action, Smuggler-Durant Mining Corporation and Last Chance No. 2, Inc., appeal from a judgment granting Golden Rule specific performance of a contract for the sale of property encompassing the land subject to quiet title decree. Golden Rule cross-appeals from that judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Heller v. Fire Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Clinic Masters v. District Court for Cty. of El PasoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. J.P. v. District Court in & for the 2nd Judicial District of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Animal Defense v. Colorado Division of WildlifeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Kruse v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. Peters v. Smuggler-Durant Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment v. CaulkColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. In re Estate of OwensColorado Court of Appeals · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API