Legal Opinion

Murray v. Stengel

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided November 15, 2021No. 4:21-cv-00012Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION MARK MURRAY, § § Plaintiff, § v . § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:21-CV-00012 PATSY STENGEL § Judge Mazzant AND § DCBC SERVICES LLC/MICHELLE § RITCHIE DBA DIAMONDS § COSMETOLOGY COLLEGE AND § DIAMONDS BARBER COLLEGE § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant DCBC Services LLC/Michelle Ritchie’s (“DCBC” or “Ritchie”) Motion to Vacate Default Judgment (Dkt. #16). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds Defendant’s motion should be GRANTED. BACKGROUND This…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. James v. FrameCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Hibernia National Bank v. Administracion Central Sociedad Anonima, Jorge Raoul Garcia Granados De GarayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. Bobby D. Lacy v. Sitel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API