Legal Opinion
Redman v. . Verplex Art Co., Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
Both parties moved for judgment on the pleadings. The Special Term granted the defendants’ and denied the plaintiff’s motion. The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division, which affirmed, but gave plaintiff leave to serve an amended complaint within twenty days. Plaintiff did not amend, and at the expiration of that time an application was made to the Special Term for leave to enter a final judgment dismissing the complaint. Such leave was given, final judgment entered, and an appeal taken therefrom to the Appellate Division, which dismissed the same. From the order of dismissal the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abbey v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- McNamara v. . GoldanNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Silverstein v. Standard Accident Insurance of Detroit, MichiganNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Vose v. ConklingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Leonard v. . BarnumNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gambold v. MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Sultzbach v. . SultzbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Kade v. Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Hill v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Hudson City Savings Institution v. Central Lundy Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.