Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Commerce
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff asks that the court declare that the North American Competitiveness Council (“NACC”) and its U.S. component subcommittees are advisory committees subject to and in violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (“FACA”), 5 U.S.C. app. §§ 1-16. The plaintiff also seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the defendants (collectively the “Commerce Department”) to comply with the requirements of FACA in relation to the NACC. This matter is before the court on the defendants’…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. Drone Advisory Comm.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Drone Advisory CommitteeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019