Legal Opinion
(PC) Wilson v. Sherman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 1, 2025No. 1:22-cv-00874Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID W. WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00874-JLT-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S LODGED THIRD AMENDED 13 v. COMPLAINT 14 STUART SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. 45) 15 Defendants. ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR 16 SCREENING OF PLAINTIFF’S LODGED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 17 (Doc. 48) 18 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 19 ANY MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND PROPOSED THIRD AMENDED 20 COMPLAINT WITHIN 21 DAYS 21 22 Plaintiff David W. Wilson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.