Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Finn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1985No. 03113PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

We here consider an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order which discharged appellee following a preliminary hearing held before a Common Pleas Court Judge. See Commonwealth ex rel. Riggins v. Superintendent of Philadelphia Prisons, 438 Pa. 160, 263 A.2d 754 (1970). The hearing court held that the Commonwealth had failed to establish a prima facie case of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and, as a result, discharged appellant. While the distinguished Judge Clinton W. Smith has in his able opinion provided a quite persuasive rationale for his ruling, we are,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. WojdakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. PradoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. CraftSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Riggins v. Superintendent of Philadelphia PrisonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MartiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. SchoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. WallerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API