Legal Opinion

Wenner v. Smith

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of tlie third district. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Powers, J.:

This case comes to ns on appeal from the third district court. It appears by the findings of fact, that the plaintiff Uriah J. Wenner was in August, 1884, and had been for three years prior thereto, a citizen of the United States and a resident and taxpayer of the city and county *239of Salt Lake, in Utah Territory, It also appears that there was no election in the territory of Utah in August, 1882, as provided by the statute, for the reason that all the elective offices of the territory had been vacated by the act of Congress, approved March 22, 1882, entitled “An act to amend section…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Bank v. County of YanktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Murphy v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Dolan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Perris v. HigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. People ex rel. Cummings v. HeadIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ulrick v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Chanlder v. StarlingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Drach v. LeckenbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Hubbard v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API