Legal Opinion

Munnss v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action of tort brought in the Superior Court for the county of Suffolk by a resident of Boston against *424a corporation domiciled in the State of Connecticut. The ad damnum of the writ originally was $10,000. The action was entered on August 5, 1912. On August 9, 1912, the plaintiff filed a motion to reduce the ad damnum to $3,000, and this motion was allowed. On the same day the defendant filed a motion for the removal of the action to the federal court on the ground of diversity of citizenship, alleging among other necessary averments that the matter in dispute between the parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Wheeler v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Cote v. New England Navigation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Long v. Quinn Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eaton v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Stevenson v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Lee v. FowlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Lawrence Trust Co. v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Paragon Coal & Coke Co. v. J. W. Kirby & Sons Coal Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API