Legal Opinion
People v. Vogler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court properly refused to suppress defendant’s pretrial statements. The record establishes that defendant voluntarily agreed to accompany police officers for further questioning at the police station. That consent is a valid substitute for probable cause (see, People v Hodge, 44 NY2d 553, 559) and obviates the need to consider whether defendant was in custody or seized in the constitutional sense at the time he made statements to an officer and whether the police had reasonable suspicion to justify defendant’s detention (see, People v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. OatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. DenisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. LangdonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LouisiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. EllerbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.