Legal Opinion

C & S Financial Services v. Bradley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1987No. 85-678PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSTON, Justice.

Plaintiff Rosie Bradley’s counts claiming conversion and trespass to fixtures were submitted to the jury. The jury returned a $25,000 general verdict for plaintiff against the defendant C & S Financial Services (“C & S”).

The trial court entered a judgment based on the jury’s verdict; it denied C & S’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative a new trial. C & S appeals. We affirm.

The first issue presented for review is whether the trial court erred in denying C & S’s motions for a directed verdict and J.N.O.V.

In Russellville Production Credit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Russellville Production Credit Ass'n v. FrostSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Richard Kelley Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. SeiboldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Wright v. FountainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. SnoddySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Alabama Elec. Co-Op. v. TapleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Clayton Homes of Decatur v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API