People v. Lopez
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment affords an accused a constitutional right to present witnesses in his own defense. Substantial government interference with a defense witness’s choice to testify violates this right.
Here, the interference involved a prosecution witness, Dennis Hoskins. Minutes after Hoskins agreed to testify at defendant Devaun Lopez’s trial, the prosecutor threatened Hoskins that deviation from his preliminary-examination testimony would result in prosecution for perjury and life imprisonment on conviction. Hoskins subsequently invoked his Fifth *707Amendment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. GarlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. PenaMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. MeredithMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. McIntoshMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- People of Michigan v. Dashawn Martise CarterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- People of Michigan v. Donell Deshawn JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- People of Michigan v. Donell Deshawn JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- People of Michigan v. Jarriel Laroy ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- People of Michigan v. Tyshawn YatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.