Behnke-Walker Business College v. Multnomah County
Oregon Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceKelly, J.
(Specially concurring.)
I concur in the result attained by the majority of the court, but cannot concur in the reasoning upon which the majority reach that result.
I think that no authority has been cited from a jurisdiction having our statutory provisions that holds the property of a business college to be exempt from taxation. In other words, no authority has been brought to my attention holding that a business college is either a literary or scientific institution. For that reason, I concur with the majority in holding that the decree of the trial court should be reversed.
I do not concur in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Yale University v. Town of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Assessors of Boston v. Garland School of Home MakingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- State v. Carleton CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Lummus v. Florida-Adirondack School, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.