Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Combs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 28, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Letcher Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*78Opinion of the Court by

Judge Nunn

Reversing.

On March 5, 1888, one Solomon Frazier conveyed to his son, Stephen P. Frazier, a body of land consisting of three surveys. The deed was in the form commonly used to convey a fee simple title, except there was suffixed to the habendum clause, the following:

“Conditioned that the party of the first part reserves unto himself the full control, of the said property during liis natural life and all. the rents, profits and proceeds thereof that are necessary for maintaining the party of the first part during his life, and conditioned further that the party…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harkness v. LisleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Stewart v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kentland Coal & Coke Co. v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Gray v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  3. Pond Creek Coal Co. v. RunyanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. White v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kentucky River Consolidated Coal Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API