Legal Opinion

Samuel & Lilian Brach v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 2, 2013No. 15460-12SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.

T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-96

UNITED STATES TAX COURT SAMUEL BRACH AND LILLIAN BRACH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 15460-12S. Filed December 2, 2013. Ronald Jay Cohen, for petitioners. Gennady Zilberman, for respondent. SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the -2- petition was filed.1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  3. Neonatology Assocs., P.A. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  4. Commissioner v. TuftsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Centennial Savings Bank FSBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API