Legal Opinion

United States of America v. Anthony Dean Prestel

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 19, 2026No. 6:23-cv-00140Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Case No. 21-CR-020-JFH Case No. 23-CV-140-JFH1 ANTHONY DEAN PRESTEL, Defendant/Petitioner. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Defendant/Petitioner Anthony Dean Prestel’s (“Defendant”) pro se (1) Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(“Original Motion”) [Dkt. Nos. 77-78] and (2) Amended

28 U.S.C. § 2255

Motion (“Amended Motion”) [Dkt. No. 94]. The Government opposes both Motions. Dkt. Nos. 83, 106. For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API