Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Nieuwenhuis v. Nieuwenhuis

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 20130394Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

MARING, Surrogate Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

[¶ 48] I concur in the majority opinion in its conclusions that the trial court’s award of attorney fees must be reversed and remanded for findings of fact; that the amended judgment must be further amended to state correctly Brian Nieu-wenhuis’s yearly net income is $42,747 and to clarify that child support must be recalculated upon the oldest child reaching eighteen or graduating from high school whichever occurs latest but no later than age nineteen; and that the court’s decision to deny the petition for contempt is not an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Tom Beuchler Construction, Inc. v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Crawford v. CrawfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API