State v. Kupis
Delaware Court of Oyer and Terminer
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Morford, one of the attorneys for the defendant, stated that the defendant had made a statement to the police officers shortly after the shooting which had been reduced to writing and signed by him; that this statement was in the possession of the Attorney-General; that it was necessary for him to see it in order to properly prepare his defense, but that the Attorney-General had refused to grant him that privilege. He then requested .the Court to direct the Attorney-General to permit him to inspect that paper.
Layton, C. J.:
The granting of the application would be contrary to all practice…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. AdamsDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1906
- State v. QuinnNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1899
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Silliman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.