Legal Opinion

State v. Kupis

Delaware Court of Oyer and Terminer

Decided May 21, 1935No. Indictment for Murder in the first degree, No. 81PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Morford, one of the attorneys for the defendant, stated that the defendant had made a statement to the police officers shortly after the shooting which had been reduced to writing and signed by him; that this statement was in the possession of the Attorney-General; that it was necessary for him to see it in order to properly prepare his defense, but that the Attorney-General had refused to grant him that privilege. He then requested .the Court to direct the Attorney-General to permit him to inspect that paper.

Layton, C. J.:

The granting of the application would be contrary to all practice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1906
  2. State v. QuinnNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. State v. DorseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Silliman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API