Legal Opinion

Lawyer v. Succession of Kountz ex rel. Cupit

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1997No. 97-C-2320PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I .WALTZER, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On 10 July 1996, plaintiff Gad M. Lawyer filed suit against the Succession of Eva Mae McBride Kountz and others. Subsequently, three named defendants filed a third party demand claiming Allstate provided insurance coverage for their actions. Allstate answered denying coverage and filed a Request for Notice. On 8 August 1997 the trial court denied Allstate’s motion for summary judgment. Allstate here seeks supervisory review of that ruling.

ANALYSIS

A review of the application and exhibits indicates that the writ is untimely. Rule 4-3, Uniform Rules, Courts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prejean v. OrtegoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Jacoby v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Watts v. DorignacLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Spangler v. ChiassonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grillette v. Warden, Winn Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Lawyer v. KountzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API