Legal Opinion

Brace v. Rashaw

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 8, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.

This is an action based on the claimed illegal employment of the plaintiff by the defendants in their laundry business. The defendants demurred to the .plaintiff’s declaration. The demurrer was overruled and the case passed to this Court before final judgment under the provisions of P. L. 2072.

P. L. 6584 sub. sec. III, as amended by No. 176, § 6 of the Acts of 1937, prohibits the employment or allowance of a child under the age of 16 years to operate laundering and other specified machinery. Exceptions to this restriction, not here material, are set forth in P. L. 6585.

It is alleged that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TaceySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  2. Gallenkamp v. Garvin Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Gallenkamp v. . Garvin Machine CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Big Three Welding Equipment Co. v. Crutcher, Rolfs, Cummings, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Big Three Welding Equipment Co. v. Crutcher, Rolfs, Cummings, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API