Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee v. Coleman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1945No. Civil No. 4634Published

1Dissent

FAULKNER, Superior Judge

(Dissenting). — In the main, I concur with the conclusions set forth in the majority opinion; but in one important matter, it is so contrary to my conceptions of law, logic, equity and sound public policy, that I am constrained to submit a dissenting opinion. It is my view that the judgment of the lower court should be reversed in its entirety, with costs to the appellants, instead of being remanded for a new trial, with what is tantamount to an instruction to hold appellant supervisors for designated parts of the claims sued upon, and for an additional twenty per cent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Board of Health v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Batterton v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Salt Lake County v. ClintonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Webster v. ParksArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Coleman v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API