Legal Opinion · Concurrence

WORTHINGTON COMMUNITIES, INC. v. Mejia

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 16, 2009No. 2D07-1490, 2D07-3698Published

1ConcurrenceAltenbernd, Judge

I concur in this opinion with the greatest of reluctance. Worthington’s primary mistake was its failure to create two corporations — one to own the development and one to serve as the general contractor. If it had taken this simple legal step, it would not have been liable in this case.

The duty owing to an employee on a construction site by an “owner/general contractor” has been a confusing subject ever since the Third District issued its opinion in Lewis v. Sims Crane Service, Inc., 498 So.2d 573 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). That opinion unfortunately intermingled a discussion of liability for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Atlantic Coast Dev. v. Napoleon SteelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Lake Parker Mall, Inc. v. CarsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Cadillac Fairview of Florida, Inc. v. CespedesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Pearson v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API