Legal Opinion
Burger v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to the district court for Custer county. Tried below before G asían, J. cited : Morrison v. State, 13 Neb., 527; Haslip v. State, 10 Id., 590. cited: Bufer v. State, 25 O. St., 464; Williams v. State, 19 Tex. App., 276; Eberhartv. State, 47 Ga., 598.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
The plaintiffs in error were informed against by the county attorney of Custer county. The information is as follows:
“Be it remembered that H. M. Sullivan, county attorney in and for Custer county, and in the tenth judicial district of the state of Nebraska, who prosecutes in the name and by the authority of the state of Nebraska, conies here in person into court at this the November term, A. D. 1890, thereof and for the’state of Nebraska gives the court to understand and be informed that Harry Hoagland and Edward Hoagland, late of the county aforesaid, on the 25th day of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Peyton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Kopcyznski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Haskins v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Heard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Worrell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935