Legal Opinion

(SS) Vang v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 4, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01740Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 PA VANG, No. 1:19-cv-01740-GSA 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF 7 JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 8 Security, AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF 9 (Doc. 22) Defendant. 10 11 I. Introduction 12 Plaintiff Pa Vang (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner 13 of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental 14 security income pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API