Legal Opinion

Pursifull v. Miracle

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 22, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

There is involved in this controversy a strip of land about 435 feet wide at the lower end next to the Cumberland river, about 300 feet wide at the upper end, or the Dortin line, and about 3,500 feet long. Mary Bell Pursifull claims to be the owner thereof, and she sought by this action against A. B. Miracle et al. to quiet her title thereto, to be adjudged the owner thereof, and to have Miracle et al. enjoined from trespassing thereon. She was unsuccessful and has appealed.

Formerly this strip of land in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Pursifull v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Threlkeld v. Breaux Ballard, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. Moran v. ChoateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Davidson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API