Loughridge v. State

1. “Presence of a person at a distillery when whisky is actually being made and his flight therefrom on seeing an officer approaching may, when not satisfactorily explained, authorize a jury to And him guilty of manufacturing whisky; and whether an attempted explanation of such presence and conduct is reasonable and satisfactory is a question for the jury.” Strickland v. State, 43 Ga. App. 578 (159 S. E. 756).

2. The evidence in the instant ease shows that the defendant and several other persons were at a distillery when whisky was actually being. made, and twenty quarts had already been…