Johnson v. Schlotman
North Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceLevine, Justice
I write to concur and to express my reasons for doing so, some of which parallel those of the majority.
By now, we, lawyers and judges, recognize that change-of-custody proceedings are wholly different animals from original custody ones. Considerations of finality guard against modifications of prior custody decrees, see Von Bank v. Von Bank, 443 N.W.2d 618 (N.D.1989), and in change-of-custody proceedings, the emphasis is on the continuation of the stability of the children’s relationship with their custodial parent. E.g., Blotske v. Leidholm, 487 N.W.2d 607 (N.D.1992). Only if it is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bezio v. PatenaudeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Blotske v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
- D. H. v. J. H.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Gravning v. GravningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.