Legal Opinion

Lexington Insurance v. Rummel

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1997No. 23435PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

1.This is an appeal from a district court order granting International Surplus Lines Insurance Company’s (ISLIC) motion for summary judgment on Lexington Insurance Company’s (Lexington) claim of prima facie tort. Lexington’s allegation of prima facie tort arose out of ISLIC’s entry into a settlement agreement in a personal injury case. According to Lexington, the settlement agreement was designed to injure Lexington by shifting partial liability for a judgment, which ISLIC and other insurers should have paid, onto Lexington. The district court granted ISLIC’s motion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Centerre Bank of Kansas City, N.A. v. Distributors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Fleet Mortgage Corp. v. SchusterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kiphart v. Community Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Boatmen's Bank of Butler v. BerwaldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Saylor v. VallesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Mosley v. TitusDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  4. Kitchell v. Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Stock v. GranthamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API