Legal Opinion
Activox, Inc. v. Envirotech Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 15, 1981No. 81 Civ. 0075 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Envirotech Corporation (“Envirotech”) and DHV Raadgevend Enginieurs Bureau B.V. (“DHV”) have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(2) to dismiss the complaint in this declaratory judgment action by plaintiff Activox, Inc. (“Activox”) seeking to declare certain patents invalid. Envirotech has also moved for costs pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41. For the reasons stated below, both motions will be granted.
The long and the short of the procedural maneuvering between the parties, about to be described, is that Activox seeks to invali date the DHV…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Zucker v. KatzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Transit Homes, Inc. v. BellamySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985