Legal Opinion

School Dist. No. 1 v. School Dist. No. 2

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1934No. 22604Published

1Per curiam

This case was tried in the district court on an agreed statement of facts, a supplemental agreed statement of facts, and the testimony of one witness. It involves the boundaries of school district No. 2, referred to as plaintiff, and school districts Nos. 1 and 46, referred to as defendants. Under authority of an Act of Congress known as the Curtis Bill, on February 5, 1902, the United States District Court within and for the Southern District of Indian Territory, Ardmore, Okla., entered a decree of incorporation of the town of Ma dill, in which decree the boundaries of said town were fixed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. RainsfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  2. McIver Lessee v. Walker and AnotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  3. Lunt v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  4. McIver Lessee v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. Cook v. HenslerWashington Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API