Legal Opinion

Richard Dillon v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2013No. 27A05-1210-CR-542Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

The State charged Richard Dillon with operating while intoxicated as a Class D felony based on a prior conviction within five years. Dillon moved to dismiss the felony enhancement because when he allegedly committed the instant OWI, he did not have a prior OWI within five years because the State had inadvertently dismissed it. The trial court denied Dillon’s motion to dismiss, reasoning that the trial court had reinstated Dillon’s prior OWI conviction with a nunc pro tunc entry. We find that because the trial court made the nunc pro tunc entry reinstating…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beanblossom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Cotton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Miller v. MuirIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. State v. MessengerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API