Richard Dillon v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
The State charged Richard Dillon with operating while intoxicated as a Class D felony based on a prior conviction within five years. Dillon moved to dismiss the felony enhancement because when he allegedly committed the instant OWI, he did not have a prior OWI within five years because the State had inadvertently dismissed it. The trial court denied Dillon’s motion to dismiss, reasoning that the trial court had reinstated Dillon’s prior OWI conviction with a nunc pro tunc entry. We find that because the trial court made the nunc pro tunc entry reinstating…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beanblossom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cotton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Miller v. MuirIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
- State v. MessengerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995