Legal Opinion

Tai's Bros. Corp. v. Seaquest (Guam), Inc. dba Seawalker Tours

Superior Court of Guam

Decided February 20, 2020No. CV1118-18Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

Q 0 1 2” 1!: 19 2 U 3 4 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM 6 TAI’S BROS. CORPORATION, ) Civil Case No. CVY 1 18-18 7 Plaintiff, ) 8 ) DECISION AND ORDER vs. ) 9 ) SEAQUEST (GUAM), NC. dba 10 SEAWALKER TOURS, ) 11 Defendant. ) 12 INTRODUCTION 13 This matter is before the Honorable Anita A. Sukola on Plaintiff Tai’s Bros. 14 Corporation’s (“TBC”) Motion for Summary Judgment. Attorney Zachary G. Damian 15 represents TBC. Attorney Philip Torres represents Defendant Seaquest (Guam) Inc. dba 16 Seawalker Tours (“Seawalker”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES TBC’s 17 Motion for Summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. A-Z Servicenter, Inc. v. SegallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Luna v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Irving Tire Co. v. Stage II Apparel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. JR Real Estate Development, LLC v. Cheeley Investment, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Wood v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API