Legal Opinion

Center for Responsible Science v. Gottlieb

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 22, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-2198Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE SCIENCE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2198 (JEB) SCOTT GOTTLIEB, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before a new pharmaceutical drug can come to market, testing must prove it to be both safe and effective. Plaintiff Center for Responsible Science believes that the Food and Drug Administration’s informed-consent regulation governing these initial human tests does not sufficiently warn participants of the dangers they face. CRS thus proposed that the FDA amend its regulation to add three additional disclosures, but…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API