Reelman v. Grosfend
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Barry; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Jacob Reelman against Evander S. Grosfend and Lucretia M. Grosfend for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
Plaintiff recovered a judgment of $171.78 for the value of lumber and material which entered into the construction of a dwelling house erected upon village lots, the record title of which is in Lucretia M. Grosfend, the wife of Evander S. Grosfend. The case is brought here by writ of error.
The record does not give the testimony in extenso. It states that after impaneling a jury the plaintiff introduced evidence to support his claim, and it then sets out particularly some of the evidence. It is then stated defendants then introduced evidence to controvert the claim of the plaintiff, and to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Emery v. LordMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Johnson v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Gillespie v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Post v. ShaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Arthur v. CaverlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Union Loan & Savings Ass'n v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1929