Legal Opinion
In re Lamedh B.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of Family Court, Erie County (McLeod, J.), entered May 1, 2002, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 3 to adjudicate respondent a juvenile delinquent.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by reducing the amount of restitution to $60 and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Family Court did not have authority under Family Ct Act § 353.6 (1) (a) to order restitution of the victim’s unreimbursed dental expenses (see Matter of Keith Z., 195 AD2d 729). Contrary to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Martin v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re Keith Z.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Jared G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re Bobbijean P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re Sean P.K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Dylan AANew York City Family Court · 2008
- In re Steven D.New York City Family Court · 2016