Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kempczinski v. Chelsea Fibre Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1913Published

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 17th day of March, 1913, dismissing his complaint. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

1Dissent

Carr, J. (dissenting):

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Term in Kings county dismissing plaintiff’s complaint at the close of his proofs. The action was brought by a servant against a master to recover for the alleged negligence of the master. The defendant is a corporation which has a large fibre mill, in which there are many persons employed and many machines used. Plaintiff was in the employment of this company about eight years before the accident, and for a period of about six years of this time he was a rigger employed in splicing ropes used in the fibre machines. On the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramsay v. ArbuckleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. Durkos v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Kirkover v. Lackawanna Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API