Legal Opinion

Czarnowsky v. . City of Rochester

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 15,1900, affirming an order of Special Term denying defendant’s motion to change the place of trial from the county of Livingston to the county of Monroe.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 15,1900, affirming an order of Special Term denying defendant’s motion to change the place of trial from the county of Livingston to the county of Monroe. The following is the question certified: Is the place óf trial of an action in ejectment to which a city of the second class is a party defendant to be determined by section 461 of chapter 182 of the Laws of 1898, as amended by chapter 581 of the Laws of 1899, or by section 982 of the Code of Civil…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below, and question certified answered as suggested therein.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Weber v. LaceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. People v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API