Sifford v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
The offense is driving while intoxicated, a felony; the punishment, four years, probated.
By his first ground of error, appellant contends the prior misdemeanor conviction is void because he did not have counsel at that time, and was indigent and had not waived counsel. The prior conviction was had March 27, 1972, and the punishment assessed included jail confinement. Accordingly, appellant was entitled to appointed counsel if he was indigent and did not waive same. See Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed.2d 530; Ramirez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 486…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
3Cited by10 opinions
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Eckert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Thaddeus Michael Lockhart v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Foley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Clyde James Freeman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.