Kohler v. Proprietors Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.
We affirm the summary final judgment in favor of Proprietors Insurance Company, issuers of an aircraft hull and liability poli*464cy. The policy, under which Kohler and Poteet, co-owners of the aircraft, claimed a loss when the aircraft was taken by one Stiller,1 excluded from coverage any operation of the aircraft “for which a charge is made.” It is undisputed that Kohler and Poteet required Stiller to make an hourly payment of $125.00 for use of the plane. The agreed-upon payment was a prerequisite to the use of the plane, not a gratuitous reimbursement of flight…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Pacific Indemnity Company v. Acel Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. Reba Ivens, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harold Ivens, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. CristSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monarch Ins. Co. of Ohio v. SiegelDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
- American Eagle Insurance v. Rutland Area Flyers, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1996