Legal Opinion
Jones v. Grady
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1936No. File No. 6368PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for breach of contract. Plaintiffs, in their complaint, set out the written contract on which they predicated their cause of action, alleged its breach and their damage in several respects, and claimed a recovery in a large amount. (See 62 N. D. 312, 243 N. W. 743, where the sufficiency of the complaint was passed upon.) Defendants, answering, admitted the making of a contract, which they set out in their answer, but denied that it was the one set out in the complaint, denied the allegations of the complaint with respect to its breach and the damages…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Christianson v. Farmers' Warehouse Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- American Employers' Liability Insurance v. FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Johnson v. RiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Doyle v. DoyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- In re WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Wiseman v. North Central Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Burt State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Burt State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936