Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 27, 1994No. CR90-551C; CA A72503PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Pursuant to ORAP 6.25(l)(b), we allow the state’s motion for reconsideration of the disposition of this case, in which we remanded for resentencing with instructions to delete defendant’s sentence of life imprisonment. State v. Harris, 126 Or App 516, 869 P2d 868 (1994). We agree that defendant need not be present for resentencing and that the case should be remanded for entry of a corrected judgment deleting defendant’s sentence of life imprisonment. State v. Bivens, 127 Or App 83, 871 P2d 486 (1994). The judgment already contains a life-time period of post-prison supervision. Defendant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BivensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GuritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API