Legal Opinion

Eureka Fire Brick Works v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 26, 1946No. Docket No. 7641Unpublished

Where the inventory method is used, an adjustment to the closing inventory requires a corresponding adjustment to the opening inventory of the same year.

1Opinion of the Court

Eureka Fire Brick Works v. Commissioner.

Eureka Fire Brick Works v. Commissioner

Docket No. 7641.

United States Tax Court

1946 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 6; 5 T.C.M. (CCH) 1106;

December 26, 1946

Where the inventory method is used, an adjustment to the closing inventory requires a corresponding adjustment to the opening inventory of the same year.

Horace S. Robeson, Esq., for the petitioner. Stanley L. Drexler, Esq., for the respondent.

LEECH

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

LEECH, Judge: This report supersedes the memorandum findings of fact and opinion in this proceeding entered on November 29, 1946…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Thomas Shoe Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1924
  3. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  4. Sinsheimer Bros., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API