Legal Opinion
Stark v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, cross motions granted and Labor Law § 240 (1) claim dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying those parts of the cross motions of defendant Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) and third-party defendant Landis & Gyr Powers, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. Paul J. Stark (plaintiff) installed a control box and valve on a cooling tower that had been erected on the roof of a building owned by Kodak. Plaintiff believed that he was on the bottom rung of the ladder and was injured…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Weininger v. Hagedorn & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Zimmerman v. PokartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Smith v. Pergament Enterprises of S.I.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Lewis v. Shawmut Woodworking & Supply, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021