Bates v. Virolet
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the déféndants, Louise Faul Virolet and others, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme .Court in favor of the plaintiff and certain of the defendants, entered in the. office of the clerk of the county of Eew Vork on the 28th day of February, 1898, upon the report of a referee.
1Opinion of the Court
Patterson, J.:
This action was brought for a partition of certain 'real estate situate in the city of New York. By the interlocutory judgment, from which this appeal is taken, it was determined that the plaintiff is seized of an undivided one-half, and that the defendants Julie O. Bertrand and Leonie 0. Kayser are each seized of an undivided one-fourth of the premises in question. The suit was originally brought by Olivia Hoyt, who alleged in her complaint that she owned one-lialf of the premises; that Olivia G. Bates owned the other half; that thé defendants Kayser and Bertrand and the three…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Mott v. . RichtmyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Hagerty v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Langdon v. AstorThe Superior Court of New York City · 1854
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Estate of OrtizNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
- In re the Estate of SlaterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Accounting of HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Murphy v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Bannin v. PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.