Legal Opinion · Dissent

Masich v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1948No. 7048Published

1DissentWade, Justice

I dissent.

The facts and issues are largely as stated in the prevailing opinion. However, I call attention to the fact that there is no contention that under the facts alleged plaintiff could not recover his damages for defendants’ negligence in a common law action if he is not precluded therefrom under the exclusive remedy provision of the occupational disease act, nor is there any claim that he is entitled to recover compensation under that act. The parties agree that if plaintiff were entitled to recover under the occupational disease act that would be his exclusive remedy. Thus the only…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Jellico Coal Co. v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Donnelly v. Minneapolis Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Jones v. Rinehart & Dennis Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API