Nesbitt v. Myers
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
This is a ballot title review proceeding. Petitioner is an elector who submitted timely written comments on the draft ballot title, as provided in ORS 250.067(1). He therefore is entitled to seek this court’s review. ORS 250.085(2). Petitioner asserts that three parts of the Attorney General’s ballot title, viz., the caption, “yes”-vote result statement, and summary, do not substantially comply with the requirements of law and must be modified. We agree with petitioner’s assertion that the caption and “yes”-vote result statement are legally insufficient. We therefore modify the Attorney…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Greenberg v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1999