Legal Opinion

Dinicu v. Groff Studios Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 25, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.), entered on or about April 7, 1994, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the motion of defendants Thomas Bradford and Sally Henderson to dismiss the complaint as against them for lack of personal jurisdiction, to the extent of referring the matter to a Special Referee to hear and report, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about October 31, 1994, which, inter alia, granted the motion of defendants Bradford and Henderson to confirm the Referee’s report dated July 21, 1994, and directed that a judgment be entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. F. I. duPont, Glore Forgan & Co. v. ChenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Textile Technology Exchange, Inc. v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Roldan v. ThorpeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Bank Hapoalim v. Kotten Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. P.S. Fin., LLC v. Eureka Woodworks, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  2. Thacker v. MalloyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Cohn v. RTW Retail Winds Acquisition LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API